Music is a universal language, and it is claimed to be a good way to create bonds between cultures and generations. I think that this melodious language may not be as effective in uniting generations as it is in connecting cultures.
Music can be a reliable initiator of a dialogue between cultures. As it is a common language for cultures with different languages, singing with others (whatever language they might speak) releases oxytocin, the 'us' hormone, temporarily enhancing empathy. That is why many people feel a sense of setting aside their differences while listening to a piece. A clear example of this is the national anthem. People from different traditions stand under one flag and sing it as a community or nation. A music festival is another example of people from various cultural backgrounds coming together and applauding one singer during the show.
However, music might not always be influential in uniting generations. Each generation finds the music of the preceding one boring or out of date, and the older generation deems the new music to be raucous and strange. That is why, for instance, parents and children rarely agree on what to listen to while driving in the car, so one party often ends up feeling annoyed or bored throughout the trip. The only time music might bridge the gap between generations is when some timeless, universal pieces that transcend all ages are being played. Generally, people of all ages equally enjoy Christmas songs, Bob Dylan, or soundtracks to iconic movies, such as The Father.
In conclusion, when it comes to cultures, we might be able to rely on music to initiate a dialogue with other cultures because it is a cultural universal and induces empathy. This may not necessarily be the case for different age groups since they view music differently, except for crossover music that knows no age boundaries. Therefore, music’s positive effects on social cohesion should not be overestimated.
